Which element is NOT typically found in the conclusion of a written piece?

The conclusion of a written piece serves to tie together the main ideas and provide closure to the reader. One of the primary functions of the conclusion is to summarize the main points presented in the work; this helps reinforce the key arguments and ensures that the reader leaves with a clear understanding of the material. Additionally, it often includes a restatement of the thesis, succinctly reminding the reader of the core argument that was established at the outset.

In addition to summarization and restating the thesis, conclusions may also touch upon the implications of the findings, which contextualizes the information within a broader scope. This can help the reader understand the relevance and significance of the arguments presented.

Introducing new information and arguments in the conclusion, on the other hand, is typically discouraged. The conclusion is meant to synthesize and reflect on the discussions that have already been made, not to introduce new concepts that the reader has not encountered before. This could confuse the reader and dilute the impact of the main arguments, as it takes away from the cohesive summary the conclusion aims to provide.